View: SPY Three Peaks and a Domed House July 2012.jpg

SPY Three Peaks and a Domed House July 2012.jpg

3 Peaks and a Domed House setting up. Credit to Carl Futia blog for spotting this in April

Comments

Nf6Nf6
This has got to be the most idiotic technical pattern ever. Most patterns are open to interpretation, but 29 points to match up is beyond my suspension of disbelief. Isn't this example invalidated by the fact that peak 15 is not higher than the "three peaks"? Of course it is. This BS is on par with EW and Astrology. 7/29/12
MarketghostechoMarketghostecho
I think James Goode's interpretation on it is worth a look (he also found 15 examples since 1920). Emerging Markets already completed this pattern in late 2011. He posts sparsely but also has a more recent look at it in a May 2012 post. 
 
http://jamesgoodeonthemoney.blogspot.co.uk/2011/04/curse- of-domed-house.html 7/29/12
Tim KnightTim Knight
AWESOME link, Mark; thank you! Great information. 7/29/12
Tim KnightTim Knight
Errr, I thought you name was "Mark" but it's "MarketGhost" - anywho, thanks, mystery-man! 7/29/12
Tim KnightTim Knight
One other thing - - this is a GREAT example of the kind of page that begs to have a Reminder set, as I have done. 7/29/12
Nf6Nf6
Great link, Marketgostecho. Thanks for providing it. Thumbing through the examples clearly shows how this "pattern" is open to interpretation. It's almost as if someone picked the pattern based on the subsequent declines. 7/29/12
lose-money/puke-guts-outlose-money/puke-guts-out
I wish this chart would give me dates..why not? 7/29/12
Price PaysPrice Pays
Thanks MarketGhost. If you plot the SPY on a weekly with MACD(12,26) it's diverging too 7/31/12
Price PaysPrice Pays
err MACD(12,26,9) 7/31/12
Closing Basis - go with the flowClosing Basis - go with the flow
well, so much for that one. 7/19/14
George BaileyGeorge Bailey
http://www.zerohedge. com/sites/default/files/images/user3303/imageroot/2014/06/20140605_EOD11_1 .png
Retrieved from http://commentsys.slopeofhope.com/lnk.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fimages%2Fuser3303%2Fimageroot%2F2014%2F06%2F20140605_EOD11_1.png&size=s
7/19/14
convictscottconvictscott
NF6 you are exactly right. This type ofsubjective, right in retrospect twaddle gives TA a bad name 7/19/14